Who was Joseph de Maistre?
Joseph de Maistre was born in Chambéry, then part of the Duchy of Savoy in the Kingdom of Sardinia and now in France. Educated by the Jesuits, he followed his father into the Senate of Savoy. When French revolutionary armies occupied Savoy in 1792 he went into exile and served the Sardinian king as a diplomat, spending years as envoy in St. Petersburg. His major works include Considerations on France (1796), the Essay on the Generative Principle of Political Constitutions, On the Pope and the St. Petersburg Dialogues, published in 1821 after his death in Turin.
Political views
Interpreted the French Revolution and the Terror as a providential punishment for France's embrace of Enlightenment secularism and egalitarianism.
Source: enlightenment-revolution.orgCalled an attack on sovereignty one of the greatest possible crimes and treated the execution of Louis XVI as a national crime.
Source: revolution.chnm.orgArgued that constitutions grow slowly under Providence rather than being designed by reason, and dismissed written constitutions as scraps of paper.
Source: en.wikipedia.orgHeld that order is the highest political value and requires a chain of obedience to God and to legitimate monarchs.
Source: enlightenment-revolution.orgDefended papal infallibility in religious matters in On the Pope, comparing the papacy to a court of final appeal.
Source: enlightenment-revolution.orgTreated the executioner and capital punishment as foundations of obedience to authority, and wrote letters defending the Spanish Inquisition.
Source: enlightenment-revolution.orgCriticized the Encyclopaedists and Rousseau for treating human beings as fundamentally rational and for relying on abstract reasoning rather than historical observation.
Source: en.wikipedia.org
Legacy
Maistre is regarded as a founder of the Catholic counter-revolutionary tradition, and his arguments for papal authority are often linked to the First Vatican Council's definition of papal infallibility in 1870. Traditionalist and reactionary writers in France drew heavily on him. Enlightenment-minded contemporaries found his ideas repugnant, and political historian Isaiah Berlin regarded him as a proto-fascist in certain respects. Others value his writing as a provocative precursor of the sociological study of violence and as a sustained critique of abstract Enlightenment reason.
In their words
Every nation, like every individual, has a mission which it must fulfill.
