Who was Thomas Hobbes?
Thomas Hobbes studied at Oxford and spent decades as a tutor and secretary to the Cavendish family. Associated with the royalist side, he left England late in 1640 and lived in exile in Paris until 1651, during the civil wars. His major political works, The Elements of Law, De Cive and Leviathan, start from a mechanistic account of human nature and ask why rational people would accept political authority. His answer is a social contract: individuals give up their natural liberty to a sovereign whose power must be unified and effectively unlimited, because divided authority leads back to civil war.
Political views
Described the state of nature without government as a war of every person against every person, in which life is insecure and short.
Source: gutenberg.orgArgued that subjects authorize the sovereign through a covenant and therefore cannot lawfully resist it except to preserve their own lives.
Source: plato.stanford.eduHeld that sovereign power must not be divided between king, parliament and church, since such division caused civil war.
Source: iep.utm.eduWrote that people unable to support themselves should be provided for by the laws of the commonwealth rather than left to private charity.
Source: gutenberg.orgPlaced the church under the sovereign, who decides which doctrines may be publicly taught.
Source: plato.stanford.eduSaw independent states as remaining in a state of nature toward one another, with no common power above them.
Source: plato.stanford.eduHeld that covenants without the power of the sword are only words, so peace requires a common power able to enforce agreements.
Source: gutenberg.org
Legacy
Hobbes is widely regarded as a founder of modern social contract theory and of the idea that political authority rests on the consent and interests of individuals rather than on divine right. Royalists distrusted him for grounding sovereignty in consent, and clergy attacked him as a materialist and alleged atheist. Later liberals rejected his absolutism but adopted his individualist starting point. Realist theorists of international relations draw on his account of anarchy between states, while critics argue that his view of human nature is too bleak and overstates the case for unchecked power.
In their words
And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short.
