Who was Adam Smith?
Adam Smith was born in Kirkcaldy, Scotland, studied at Glasgow and Oxford, and became professor of moral philosophy at the University of Glasgow. His Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) explained morality through sympathy and the imagined judgment of an impartial spectator. After serving as tutor to the young Duke of Buccleuch on a tour of France, he published An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776. He spent his final years as a Commissioner of Customs in Edinburgh. He is a central figure of the Scottish Enlightenment.
Political views
Argued that once systems of preference and restraint are removed, a simple system of natural liberty establishes itself.
Source: gutenberg.orgCriticized the mercantile system of tariffs, monopolies and colonial trade restrictions as harmful to national wealth.
Source: plato.stanford.eduLimited the duties of government mainly to defense, the administration of justice and certain public works and institutions.
Source: iep.utm.eduProposed publicly supported parish schools so that even common laborers could afford basic education.
Source: gutenberg.orgWarned that people of the same trade seldom meet without the conversation turning to schemes to raise prices against the public.
Source: gutenberg.orgSupported the Navigation Acts as an exception to free trade, on the grounds that defense matters more than opulence.
Source: gutenberg.orgPraised the productivity of the division of labor while warning that repetitive work can leave laborers ignorant, a harm he thought public education should offset.
Source: gutenberg.org
Legacy
Smith is often called the founder of modern economics, and free-market economists and classical liberals regard The Wealth of Nations as a foundational defense of competition and open trade. Scholars across the spectrum also stress that his Theory of Moral Sentiments grounded economic life in sympathy, justice and moral norms. Some on the left cite his criticism of merchants, monopolies and the effects of the division of labor on workers. Critics have argued that his defense of self-interest was later used to justify inequality, while others contend that reading him as a pure advocate of laissez-faire ignores his qualifications.
In their words
It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.
