Who was Rutherford B. Hayes?
Rutherford B. Hayes (1822-1893), an Ohio lawyer, was wounded several times as a Union officer in the Civil War and served in Congress and three terms as governor of Ohio. The 1876 election against Democrat Samuel Tilden produced disputed returns in three Southern states, and an electoral commission awarded them to Hayes amid an informal understanding that federal support for the remaining Republican governments in the South would end. In office he withdrew those troops, faced the nationwide railroad strike of 1877, defended a gold-backed currency and challenged his party's patronage machine. He kept his pledge to serve a single term and later worked for education and prison reform.
Political views
Removed the federal troops upholding Republican governments in Louisiana and South Carolina after Democratic leaders pledged to respect Black civil and voting rights.
Source: millercenter.orgCalled for federal aid for education, arguing that universal suffrage should rest upon universal education.
Source: millercenter.orgSent federal troops to preserve order during the Great Strike of 1877, the first deployment of the Army in states during a labor dispute.
Source: millercenter.orgOpposed greenbacks and the free coinage of silver, defending a currency backed by gold.
Source: millercenter.orgPushed for a thorough reform of the civil service, angering Republican leaders who relied on patronage.
Source: millercenter.orgVetoed a bill limiting Chinese passengers per ship as a breach of treaty, then negotiated a treaty allowing the United States to regulate and suspend Chinese labor immigration.
Source: millercenter.orgDeclared in 1880 that the policy of the United States was a canal across the isthmus under American control.
Source: millercenter.org
Legacy
Historians often credit Hayes with restoring a measure of integrity to the presidency after the scandals of the Grant years and with early steps toward a merit-based civil service. Critics argue that the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, part of what is often called the Compromise of 1877, ended Reconstruction and abandoned Black Southerners to disenfranchisement and segregation, despite the assurances he sought. Labor historians also note that his use of the Army in the 1877 strike set a precedent for federal intervention on the side of employers. Opponents at the time disputed the legitimacy of his election, calling him 'His Fraudulency.'
In their words
The policy of this country is a canal under American control.
