Who was Immanuel Kant?
Immanuel Kant was born in 1724 in Konigsberg, East Prussia, into a Lutheran family shaped by Pietism, and spent his whole working life at the city's university, becoming professor of logic and metaphysics in 1770. His Critique of Pure Reason (1781) transformed modern philosophy. His political writings include What Is Enlightenment? (1784), Toward Perpetual Peace (1795) and the Doctrine of Right in The Metaphysics of Morals (1797). In 1794 a royal order under Frederick William II barred him from writing or lecturing on religion. He died in Konigsberg, now Kaliningrad in Russia, in 1804.
Political views
Held that the one innate right is freedom, meaning independence from another's choice, insofar as it can coexist with everyone's freedom under universal law.
Source: plato.stanford.eduArgued that laws are legitimate only if a whole people could consent to them, treating the social contract as an idea of reason rather than a historical event.
Source: plato.stanford.eduConsidered a republic with separated powers and elected representatives the ideal constitution.
Source: iep.utm.eduDefined enlightenment as thinking for oneself and defended the free public use of reason as the safeguard of the people's rights.
Source: plato.stanford.eduDenied any right of revolution or rebellion, while viewing the early French Revolution as a sign of historical progress.
Source: plato.stanford.eduProposed in Perpetual Peace that republican states form a federation, or league of nations, and recognize a cosmopolitan right of hospitality.
Source: iep.utm.edu
Legacy
Kant is among the most influential philosophers in history, and his political ideas shaped liberal theories of rights and the rule of law, including the work of John Rawls. Perpetual Peace is widely seen as an intellectual forerunner of the League of Nations, the United Nations and the democratic peace thesis. Admirers credit him with grounding politics in human dignity and equal freedom. Critics point to his exclusion of women and the poor from full citizenship, his denial of any right to resist even unjust rulers, his defense of the death penalty, and his earlier writings that ranked human races, which scholars now debate as a serious flaw in his universalism.
