Who was Robert Peel?
Robert Peel was born in Lancashire in 1788, the son of a wealthy cotton manufacturer and MP. He entered Parliament in 1809 and at first opposed Catholic emancipation, earning the nickname Orange Peel. As Home Secretary from 1822 he reformed the criminal law and prisons, and in 1829 he created the Metropolitan Police and steered Catholic emancipation through Parliament. His Tamworth Manifesto of 1834 set out principles for a reformed Conservative Party. He was Prime Minister in 1834-1835 and 1841-1846. His second government faced economic hardship and unemployment, and he restored the income tax in order to reduce tariffs. He resigned in June 1846, on the day the Corn Laws were repealed, after a defeat on another bill, and died in 1850 after a riding accident.
Political views
In the Tamworth Manifesto accepted the 1832 Reform Act as a final settlement and promised a careful review of institutions combined with respect for established rights.
Source: historyhome.co.ukAs Home Secretary, reduced the number of crimes punishable by death by around 100 and reformed the prison system.
Source: gov.ukCreated the Metropolitan Police in London in 1829.
Source: gov.ukTook steps to liberalise trade in the 1840s, though he was not an ideological free trader.
Source: gov.ukRepealed the Corn Laws in 1846, ending tariffs on imported grain, in response to famine in Ireland and poor harvests.
Source: ebsco.comSupported the Mines Act 1842 and the Factory Act 1844 limiting the work of women and children.
Source: gov.uk
Legacy
Admirers see Peel as the founder of modern conservatism and a pragmatic reformer who put national interest above party, pointing to policing, penal reform and free trade. Critics in his own party, led by Disraeli, accused him of betraying the landed interest and his election commitments over the Corn Laws and Catholic emancipation. The split of 1846 kept the Conservatives largely out of majority government for a generation. Historians continue to debate whether his changes of position reflected principle or expediency.
In their words
a careful review of institutions, civil and ecclesiastical, undertaken in a friendly temper combining, with the firm maintenance of established rights, the correction of proved abuses and the redress of real grievances
