Who was Mikhail Bakunin?
Mikhail Bakunin was born into a noble family in Pryamukhino, in the Russian Empire, and left a military career to study philosophy in Moscow and Berlin. He took part in the revolutions of 1848-1849, was arrested, imprisoned and exiled to Siberia, and escaped in 1861. In western Europe he became the main voice of anti-authoritarian socialism in the International Workingmen's Association until he was expelled at the Hague Congress in 1872 after a conflict with Marx. His works include God and the State and Statism and Anarchy. He died in Bern, Switzerland.
Political views
Held that a revolution must abolish the state rather than capture it, writing that where there is a state there is domination.
Source: plato.stanford.eduWarned that a Marxist workers' state would be run by a new privileged minority of former workers and intellectuals.
Source: marxists.orgAdvocated collective ownership of land and the means of production by free associations of workers.
Source: marxists.orgArgued that freedom and socialism are inseparable, rejecting both liberal capitalism and authoritarian socialism.
Source: marxists.orgRejected religion and divine authority as foundations of political domination.
Source: theanarchistlibrary.orgFavored a federation of autonomous communes built from the bottom up.
Source: plato.stanford.edu
Legacy
Bakunin's ideas strongly influenced anarchist movements in Spain, Italy, Switzerland and Latin America, including the Spanish anarchist unions that were a major force in the 1930s. Anarchists and some historians credit him with predicting that a revolutionary state could become a new bureaucratic ruling class, a theme later raised by critics of the Soviet Union. Marxists accused him of conspiratorial methods and of splitting the International. Liberal and conservative critics point to his endorsement of insurrection, and historians have documented antisemitic passages in his polemics against Marx. He remains a reference point for libertarian socialists, and his slogan that the passion for destruction is a creative passion, from an 1842 essay, is often quoted by admirers and critics alike as a summary of his revolutionary temperament.
In their words
Convinced that freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice and that Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality.
They will no longer represent the people, but only themselves and their claims to rulership over the people.
